Tomographic plaque imaging with CT: technical considerations and capabilities
Section snippets
Coronary calcium and atherosclerotic plaque
Recent studies have confirmed that arterial calcium development is intimately associated with vascular injury and atherosclerotic plaque evolution and is largely controlled by common cellular and subcellular mechanisms.1, 2, 3, 4 Calcium can be seen in all degrees of atherosclerotic involvement and is an active process. Thus, the long held notion of so-called “degenerative” calcification of the coronary arteries with aging is not correct.
The incidence of coronary artery calcium by CT as a
CT methods
This section will discuss methods related to coronary artery calcium identification. Specific methods of contrast-enhanced coronary lumen imaging using EBT and MDCT are discussed elsewhere.
Variability and calibration
When comparing measurement devices, calibration to an external standard is crucial for comparability between both EBT and MDCT over time. Significant variability in the measurement of the 130 HU threshold has been documented within and between EBT scanners even when serviced and maintained at the same site.31 Use of an external calibration phantom was shown to reduce scanner variation with EBT by 25%. Because there may be measurement errors both within the same and between different EBT systems
Imaging speed/temporal resolution
Overall CT image quality is dependent on multiple factors throughout the imaging sequence. These include image noise, blurring, spatial resolution, and other factors related to both the imaging device and patient. In the case of measuring calcified plaques of various sizes, temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and image noise are important to varying degrees. Cardiac CT is dependent on having a high temporal resolution to minimize coronary motion. By coupling rapid image acquisition with
Studies comparing EBT and MDCT for calcium scoring
Becker et al studied 100 patients comparing MDCT with EBT and reported a high correlation between the 2 modalities.43 In this study, however, the percent variability between individuals was 32% for CAC scores. There were relatively few patients with scores <100, and the high correlation may have been driven by those individuals with high scores. Moreover, the level of individual precision was limited and the scores <100 appeared to have the most deviation by MDCT as compared with EBT. Although
Signal versus noise
Early detection of calcified plaque is dependent on distinguishing the plaque from image noise. MDCT systems have reduced image noise compared with EBT systems. Image noise with EBT has been shown to have an association with body mass index,47 which may result in falsely identifying noise as calcified plaque or overestimation of true plaque burden. On the other hand, the image blurring by MDCT may result in false-negative studies or underestimation of true plaque burden.
Prospective gated
Radiation exposure
One drawback of MDCT as compared with EBT is the higher radiation exposure to the patient.32, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 Radiation exposure from prospectively gated studies is much less than from retrospectively gated studies. The x-ray photon flux expressed by the product of x-ray tube current and exposure time (mA) is generally higher with MDCT. For example, 400 mA with 0.5-second exposure time yields 200 mA in MDCT versus 614 mA (fixed tube current) with 0.1-second exposure time
Reproducibility of calcium scoring
A promise of these technologies is to accurately measure atherosclerosis burden and to track changes over time to assess efficacy of therapy.59 This ability to assess progression is dependent on the reproducibility of the technologies. EBT interscan reproducibility has been shown to be approximately 10%, with interreader variability approximately 3% and intra-reader variability <1%.60, 61 This has been significantly more problematic with MDCT. The interscan variability in several studies is 32%
The issue of slice thickness
The Agatston calcium scoring was designed as an area measurement and is predicated on a 3.0-mm slice thickness. Although this is likely not the ideal tomographic slice thickness for coronary artery imaging, it was chosen historically because the original EBT scanning system in use at the time for research had 3.0 mm as the thinnest slice available. Current EBT systems are now able to perform scanning at 1.5 mm, and the latest MDCT systems can provide slice thicknesses that are ≤1 mm. However,
Summary and conclusions
EBT has undergone rigorous testing for reliability and validity and has proven to be useful in identifying individuals with, or at risk for, CHD. Although MDCT is a promising tool for coronary calcium scoring, more studies are needed comparing EBT and helical CT scans in the same patients, especially with calcium scores <100. MDCT studies evaluating progression, reproducibility, and plaque burden determined by independent methods like intravascular ultrasound or autopsy and outcomes studies are
References (69)
- et al.
Differences in prevalence and extent of coronary artery calcium detected by ultrafast computed tomography in asymptomatic men and women
Am J Cardiol
(1993) - et al.
Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults
Am J Cardiol
(2001) - et al.
Significance of calcification of the coronary arteries
Am J Cardiol
(1970) - et al.
Value of fluoroscopy in the detection of coronary stenosisinfluence of age, sex, and number of vessels calcified on diagnostic efficacy
Am Heart J
(1988) - et al.
Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humansA histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1998) - et al.
Noninvasive definition of anatomic coronary artery disease by ultrafast CTA quantitative pathologic study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1992) - et al.
Relations of coronary calcium determined by electron beam computed tomography and lumen narrowing determined at autopsy
Am J Cardiol
(1994) - et al.
Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1997) - et al.
Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1990) - et al.
Independent and incremental value of coronary artery calcium for predicting the extent of angiographic coronary artery diseaseComparison with cardiac risk factors and radionuclide perfusion imaging
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1999)
Comparison of spiral and electron beam tomography in the evaluation of coronary calcification in asymptomatic persons
Int J Cardiol
Electron beam CT coronary calcium scanninga review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic individuals
Mayo Clin Proc
Correlation of coronary calcification and angiographically documented stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery diseaseResults of 1,764 patients
J Am Coll Cardiol
Use of electron beam tomography data to develop models for prediction of hard coronary events
Am Heart J
Bone morphogenetic protein expression in human atherosclerotic lesions
J Clin Invest
Osteopontin mRNA is expressed by smooth muscle-derived foam cells in human atherosclerotic lesions of the aorta
J Clin Invest
Expression of osteopontin messenger RNA by macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. A possible association with calcification
Am J Pathol
High expression of genes for calcification-regulating proteins in human atherosclerotic plaque
J Clin Invest
Calcification of the coronary arteries
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Coronary Artery CalcificationPathophysiology, epidemiology, image methods and clinical implications—A scientific statement from the American Heart Association
Circulation
Bone morphogenetic protein expression in human atherosclerotic lesions
J Clin Invest
Osteopontin mRNA is expressed by smooth muscle-derived foam cells in human atherosclerotic lesions of the aorta
J Clin Invest
Expression of osteopontin messenger RNA by macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. A possible association with calcification
Am J Pathol
High expression of genes for calcification-regulating proteins in human atherosclerotic plaque
J Clin Invest
Incidence and significance of coronary artery calcification
Brit Heart J
Cinefluorography of coronary artery calcification
Am J Radiol
Clinical significance of coronary artery calcification seen fluoroscopically with the image intensifier
Circulation
Cinefluorography of coronary artery calcification
Am J Radiol
Clinical significance of coronary artery calcification seen fluoroscopically with the image intensifier
Circulation
Remodeling of coronary arteries in human and nonhuman primates
JAMA
Coronary artery calcium areas by electron beam computed tomography and coronary atherosclerotic plaque areaA histopathologic correlative study
Circulation
Use of ultrafast (cine) x-ray computed tomography in cardiac and cardiovascular imaging
Validation of minimally invasive measurement of myocardial perfusion using electron beam computed tomography and application in human volunteers
Heart
Cited by (18)
ACR appropriateness criteria asymptomatic patient at risk for coronary artery disease
2014, Journal of the American College of RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Patients who have calcification detected by chest fluoroscopy also have a significantly poorer survival [12]. CACS, performed on either an electron-beam CT or MDCT, is a proven marker for the presence of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of future cardiovascular events [13,14]. CACS is useful in risk stratification and reclassification, as a strong association has been found between the calcium score and future mortality and/or adverse cardiac events [15-17].
Determinants of Coronary Calcium Conversion Among Patients With a Normal Coronary Calcium Scan. What Is the "Warranty Period" for Remaining Normal?
2010, Journal of the American College of CardiologyScreening patients for subclinical atherosclerosis with non-contrast cardiac CT
2007, AtherosclerosisCitation Excerpt :Recent studies have reported incidental cardiac and extra-cardiac findings that could perpetuate further inadvertent diagnostic tests. A summary of some of the strengths and limitations associated with use of cardiac CT are noted in Table 2[48–53]. While cardiac CT appears to be capable of adding predictive value to measurement of established risk factors in asymptomatic intermediate-risk patients, its misuse as a broad based ‘routine screening’ tool especially in low risk cohorts, should be avoided until more information regarding its cost effectiveness in various populations becomes available.
Association between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and progression of coronary artery calcium: A prospective cohort study
2015, Cardiovascular DiabetologyCoronary computed tomography: Current role and future perspectives for cardiovascular risk stratification
2012, European Heart Journal Cardiovascular ImagingCoronary computed tomography: Current role and future perspectives for cardiovascular risk stratification
2011, Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease - Cardiac Series